🔗 Share this article

Tehran is willing to reinitiate nuclear discussions with Washington as long as it is approached with "dignity" and "respect", Tehran's top diplomat has announced.

Abbas Araghchi said solely negotiations produced results, and shared recent overtures had originated from go-betweens to resume discussions with the American leadership. He claimed Iran possessed no secret atomic facilities, and Iran could not yet allow the UN nuclear inspectorate to access struck enrichment centers for safety concerns.

Walking a Challenging Path

The foreign minister is treading a challenging course since Iran does not want be perceived to be operating from a situation of weakness, and he consistently maintained that Iran had emerged more powerful militarily and psychologically from the coordinated strike on its enrichment centers in June.

He was speaking at a defense forum in Tehran where he reiterated that Iran had "a fundamental entitlement to process nuclear material on home soil that it will perpetually retain" – the main reason of the stalemate in the previous talks.

Earlier Discussions Suddenly Concluded

The prior phases of negotiations between the United States and Iran were concluded unexpectedly and bitter termination on 12 June when the Israeli government, with US support, struck Iran's enrichment centers in a two-week conflict that ended with the American leader claiming the facilities had been obliterated. Afterward, Western states exercised their right to restore international penalties, but Iran maintains they have not had a significant effect.

Perfect Agreement Proposed

Iranian officials said they felt they had achieved a "ideal resolution" to the uranium processing matter in prior discussions, when it was decided an local partnership with American involvement could enrich uranium. The two nations would have been able to claim victory since home-based processing would have remained and the US could be confident that Iran's enrichment initiative was entirely non-military.

It had not been agreed in the negotiations that American atomic experts could work on Iranian soil, but that was a logical implication of the cooperative offer. Representatives stated on multiple occasions they had achieved a deal with the US representative Steve Witkoff only for the agreement to collapse due to "opponents in the US".

Existing Situation

Iranian officials declared the consortium offer was now off the table, but it seems highly likely the offer could be reintroduced in some form if discussions restart.

The US president last week said he had been obtaining communications that Iran sought to restart talks, but confidentially Iranian officials say they are not yet receiving coherent offers from America either explicitly or from significant local go-betweens, such as Qatar, Egypt, Oman and Saudi Arabia. The Tehran's diplomatic corps has been charged of non-responsiveness in the face of the US president's straightforward manner, but Iran states diplomacy is not part of a performance.

Negotiating Standpoint

In his address to the forum, intended to portray the US as a dominant force that misuses the concept of international law, Araghchi said the two-week conflict demonstrated the conflict could not be resolved by armed force. He said the assaults began with a Washington's ultimatum for an unconditional Iranian surrender and concluded with an unconditional call for a halt to hostilities.

Iran is certain the initial Israeli attacks were executed with complete American awareness and collaboration, making confidence difficult to reestablish.

Dialogue Remains the Final Solution

Araghchi stated: "Tehran was not the one that had abandoned negotiations; it was America and the Western nations that had repeatedly sought to enforce their demands during the discussions. Diplomacy can still be active and stays the ultimate answer to address conflicts, but its standards, regulations and fundamentals must be respected."

"If they talk to the citizens of Tehran with the approach of respect and respect, they will obtain a response in the identical language."

Recovery and Recovery

In what is characterized by Iran's diplomats as the struggle of repair and recovery, Araghchi claimed he was assured Iran's defence capabilities "are much stronger than prior to 13 or 14 June of this year. All our capabilities have been rebuilt. We learned numerous insights from this war; we have identified our own weaknesses and the weaknesses of the enemy."

He continued: "We effectively endured this conflict. Our enrichment knowledge, which they aimed to obliterate, continues to exist. The sites and equipment, if eliminated, will be reconstructed; what is crucial is the resolve of the citizens of Tehran and then the social solidarity that they targeted, but were unable to break. The Iranian people have developed more powerful, more united, and more supportive of the leadership and the state in the wake of this invasion."